Stratigicon

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace:
archivalitem01_alex_felix

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
archivalitem01_alex_felix [2022/11/21 13:07] – adminarchivalitem01_alex_felix [2022/11/21 13:09] (current) – admin
Line 11: Line 11:
 "Sugar daddying, also called sugaring, is a transactional dating practice typically characterized by an older wealthier person and a younger person in need of financial assistance in a mutually beneficial relationship." Wikipedia "Sugar daddying, also called sugaring, is a transactional dating practice typically characterized by an older wealthier person and a younger person in need of financial assistance in a mutually beneficial relationship." Wikipedia
  
-((photo)) +【photo】 
-----+
 In a such relationship the younger woman will offer companionship, youthful energy in exchange for the older man financial assistance. Some sugar babies have the financial assistance of the sugar daddy as their only source of income. Which is very sad. Now imagine if a countries politicians acted like sugar babies and this is exactly what happened in Afghanistan in the past two decades.\\ In a such relationship the younger woman will offer companionship, youthful energy in exchange for the older man financial assistance. Some sugar babies have the financial assistance of the sugar daddy as their only source of income. Which is very sad. Now imagine if a countries politicians acted like sugar babies and this is exactly what happened in Afghanistan in the past two decades.\\
 So what happened was that many of the ruling politicians in Afghanistan for the past two decades saw the US and its allies as their sugar daddy. Where they will be puppets and in exchange the US will do almost everything for them be it the economy, security, development etc.\\ So what happened was that many of the ruling politicians in Afghanistan for the past two decades saw the US and its allies as their sugar daddy. Where they will be puppets and in exchange the US will do almost everything for them be it the economy, security, development etc.\\
Line 19: Line 19:
 Anyway I will not judge them harshly from the comfort of my house writing this answer. If the government had any chance to fight the Taliban then the political actors in Afghanistan should have been much more smarter and much more united in the past two decades. Also they should have made sure that they didn't depend on another country 100 % for their survival. I can go on and write about the major political mistakes that they did. But writing about those mistakes is one thing and fixing those mistakes on the ground is another thing. The reailty is much harsher on the ground. Afghanistan really lacked good leadership. Anyway I will not judge them harshly from the comfort of my house writing this answer. If the government had any chance to fight the Taliban then the political actors in Afghanistan should have been much more smarter and much more united in the past two decades. Also they should have made sure that they didn't depend on another country 100 % for their survival. I can go on and write about the major political mistakes that they did. But writing about those mistakes is one thing and fixing those mistakes on the ground is another thing. The reailty is much harsher on the ground. Afghanistan really lacked good leadership.
  
-((photo))+【photo】\\
  
 The Tajik, Hazara leaders with the Pakistani foreign minister just before the Taliban took over Afghanistan. Then they were kicked out of Afghanistan. The Tajik, Hazara leaders with the Pakistani foreign minister just before the Taliban took over Afghanistan. Then they were kicked out of Afghanistan.
  
 Collected from Quora.com on 21 November 2022. Collected from Quora.com on 21 November 2022.
archivalitem01_alex_felix.1669054071.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/11/21 13:07 by admin