for_policy_wonks
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
for_policy_wonks [2025/06/19 03:21] – created kc | for_policy_wonks [2025/06/21 15:17] (current) – kc | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Unless you’ve looked closely at the evolutionary roots of cooperation, | Unless you’ve looked closely at the evolutionary roots of cooperation, | ||
- | | + | The social contract is not something the state offers. It’s something people build — and then the state is built on top of that. |
That insight is often left out of the usual political and academic discourse. Even respected sources like Wikipedia define the social contract as a theory about the legitimacy of state authority over individuals. | That insight is often left out of the usual political and academic discourse. Even respected sources like Wikipedia define the social contract as a theory about the legitimacy of state authority over individuals. | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
But the real story — documented by thinkers like Brian Skyrms and foreshadowed long ago by the philosopher Xunzi — is deeper. The social contract first emerged before states, from small-scale agreements among people to refrain from harming each other and to solve problems together. You don’t need a constitution to have a social contract. You need only this: | But the real story — documented by thinkers like Brian Skyrms and foreshadowed long ago by the philosopher Xunzi — is deeper. The social contract first emerged before states, from small-scale agreements among people to refrain from harming each other and to solve problems together. You don’t need a constitution to have a social contract. You need only this: | ||
- | | + | “If you don’t try to hurt me, I won’t try to hurt you.” |
This compact, in its many cultural forms, is the glue that holds everything else in place — families, tribes, courts, legislatures, | This compact, in its many cultural forms, is the glue that holds everything else in place — families, tribes, courts, legislatures, | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The result? A slow cultural shift away from shared values like fairness, conscience, and empathy: | The result? A slow cultural shift away from shared values like fairness, conscience, and empathy: | ||
- | | + | Conscience is dismissed as childhood conditioning. |
- | | + | Empathy is called weakness. |
- | | + | Compassion is seen as letting others off the hook. |
- | | + | Fairness is downgraded to a mere social construct. |
- | | + | The Golden Rule becomes “Do unto others before they do unto you.” |
In such an environment, | In such an environment, | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
To turn this around, policymakers must understand: | To turn this around, policymakers must understand: | ||
- | | + | People accept laws when they trust the system is fair. |
- | | + | People cooperate when they believe others are also cooperating. |
- | | + | People withdraw, resist, or revolt when they feel exploited or abandoned. |
So any effort to rebuild civic harmony must start from the ground up — reviving trust, reinforcing fairness, and re-establishing mutual restraint as a norm. | So any effort to rebuild civic harmony must start from the ground up — reviving trust, reinforcing fairness, and re-establishing mutual restraint as a norm. | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
But if you recognize the erosion I’m describing — and you want to preserve a government of, by, and for the people — then help re-center the conversation. The problem isn’t just crime, polarization, | But if you recognize the erosion I’m describing — and you want to preserve a government of, by, and for the people — then help re-center the conversation. The problem isn’t just crime, polarization, | ||
- | | + | The root problem is that the social contract has been hollowed out. Fix that — or everything built on top of it remains at risk. |
for_policy_wonks.txt · Last modified: 2025/06/21 15:17 by kc