remarks_by_az
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
remarks_by_az [2021/10/03 13:01] – 45.130.83.195 | remarks_by_az [2022/09/13 20:35] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== The political structures for Afghanistan in the future ====== | ====== The political structures for Afghanistan in the future ====== | ||
- | ===== AZ ===== | + | |
==== Can we better fit nurture to nature?==== | ==== Can we better fit nurture to nature?==== | ||
- | In ancient Chinese philosophy it is said 本立而道生 běn lì ér dào shēng, " | ||
- | |||
- | To me, the idea of the " | ||
- | |||
- | The practical problem comes when somebody figures out that all the other community members are docile, but s/he can behave as the predator invisible in the midst of the flock. Most societies nurture and indoctrinate youngsters so that they know what is expected of them. When they break the contract in little ways, they may be nurtured and taught to make up for cases when they have not foreseen the natural consequences of their predatory or parasitic behavior. If they produce severe consequences, | ||
- | |||
- | I think that we need to understand how bonds of trust and responsibility can develop in a society that is run in this way, and that they make it possible for individuals to give allegiance to a society and to its government. | ||
- | If this basic idea is right, then the US attempts in Afghanistan were highly probable | + | ===== AZ ===== Old content removed |
- | ==== RUI ==== | + | ===== RUI ===== No content yet |
+ | [[start]] |
remarks_by_az.1633280490.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/09/13 20:21 (external edit)