turning_points_in_america_s_afghan_war
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
turning_points_in_america_s_afghan_war [2022/11/21 15:34] – admin | turning_points_in_america_s_afghan_war [2023/03/26 15:16] (current) – removed one false statement kc | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=====Turning Points in America' | =====Turning Points in America' | ||
- | Two views on what happened to Afghanistan over the last two decades. The first chart depends on the FDD series of maps((1)), and it appears to me to give an understandable narrative of how the Taliban emerged as winner. The second chart depends on "the Gilliams" | + | Two views on what happened to Afghanistan over the last two decades. The first chart depends on the FDD series of maps((https:// |
{{: | {{: | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
The FDD-related chart shows that anti-Taliban forces held about 38% of Afghanistan shortly after the US invasion, lost ground until the Obama surge, when it rose from less than 10% to somewhat less than 30%. Then, in 2018, there was a strong inflection point. After that, the government steadily lost territory and had almost no territory under its control shortly after the US withdrawal. It appears that when Trump cut the Afghan officials out of the picture and began direct negotiations with the Taliban, few if any Afghans believed that the government was viable. | The FDD-related chart shows that anti-Taliban forces held about 38% of Afghanistan shortly after the US invasion, lost ground until the Obama surge, when it rose from less than 10% to somewhat less than 30%. Then, in 2018, there was a strong inflection point. After that, the government steadily lost territory and had almost no territory under its control shortly after the US withdrawal. It appears that when Trump cut the Afghan officials out of the picture and began direct negotiations with the Taliban, few if any Afghans believed that the government was viable. | ||
- | The Taliban originally held around 92% of Afghanistan, | + | The Taliban originally held around 92% of Afghanistan, |
- | "The Taliban increased their control of wider swaths of the country – and by June of this year[2020], contested or controlled an estimated 50% to 70% of Afghan territory outside of urban centers, according to a United Nations Security Council report." | + | "The Taliban increased their control of wider swaths of the country – and by June of this year [2020], contested or controlled an estimated 50% to 70% of Afghan territory outside of urban centers, according to a United Nations Security Council report." |
+ | |||
+ | "The precise strength of the Taliban, .... is not accurately known. UN Security Council monitors last year said the group had between 55,000 and 85,000 fighters." | ||
+ | |||
+ | In early 2021, " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The general rule is that the ratio of one's troops to the troops in an insurgency should be three to one. Therefore, for Biden to have overcome the Taliban after he came to office, he would need to have ramped up US presence in Afghanistan to something around 180,000 troops. However, at the peak of the Obama surge the US had more than 100,000 troops on the ground. That move was not done in a matter of weeks, and the surge was not a complete success since the Taliban recovered after US troop levels were reduced to 8,400. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here us a diagram that indicates what a challenge it would have been to turn matters around in the early months of 2021, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
The moral of the story is that if you wear rose-colored glasses\\ you can't see the flashing blue lights of the police car bearing down on you.\\ | The moral of the story is that if you wear rose-colored glasses\\ you can't see the flashing blue lights of the police car bearing down on you.\\ | ||
- | [[start]] | + | |
[[start]] | [[start]] |
turning_points_in_america_s_afghan_war.1669062849.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/11/21 15:34 by admin